| Scope
of Work: Task 6 Project Management In
addition to five research tasks to be carried
out, we have defined a separate task 6 for
project management activities. This project
requires diligent technical, project, and quality
management. By providing a separate task, the
Golder Associates team will ensure that the
resources required for management are provided.
Project management activities will include the
following:
- control of budgets and schedules and
coordination of technical staff,
- formal weekly progress and coordination
meetings, with reporting of the results
of those meeting to BDM/NIPER,
- weekly tracking of cost and schedule
using Golder Associates' DCAA approved
project management system,
- coordination of staff at Golder
Associates and subcontractors,
- electronic mail communication among all
members of the project team,
- preparation of monthly progress reports
for BDM/NIPER,
- management under quality assurance
standards as defined by ISO 9001,
- management and response to review
comments on draft reports.
Task 6 will also provide the framework for
project meetings, including a kick-off meeting
and three project status meetings at BDM/NIPER
offices, and four coordination meetings between
Golder, MIT, and Marathon personnel.
Discussion:
Management Structure
Golder has the experience and management
resources needed to implement a total quality
approach to the management of all tasks to be
carried out within this project. All task order
management activities will be performed within
the context of a QA Program Plan (QAPP),
developed in compliance with Golder Associates
Inc. ISO-9001 compliant Quality Management Plan
(QMP). The key to the project management plan
will be the use of specific work instructions
(SWI) to control to execution, review, and
presentation of all project activities. The
project management structure is illustrated in Figure 7-1.
Administrative control of project tasks will
be implemented through a "fast-track"
reporting system, which is designed to manage and
track work products, deliverables, cost and
schedule. The system uses a computerized database
which encompasses each task order and its
smallest definable components or subtasks.
Progress and cost status are routinely entered or
updated and reported on a weekly basis. This
tracking system typically operates at a level of
detail beyond what normal contractual reporting
requirements may require; it recognizes the
interdependencies and differences among tracking
technical work, cost accounting and schedule
management, and provides timely identification
and reporting of problems related to technical
progress and budget.
The entire task management process will be
administered in compliance with applicable
technical procedures as required by the Golder
QMP, as well as the fast-track reporting system
described above, and will be based on several
sequential elements:
- review of draft task order statement of
work requirements; preliminary
identification of personnel assignments,
man-hour requirements for each subtask,
and the identification of the other
project resource requirements needed to
fulfill the requirements of the order;
- assignment of unique cost element and
document control numbers;
- preparation of a program evaluation and
report (PERT) chart defining schedules
and linkages between and among the
various subtasks;
- confirmation of the technical, schedule,
and deliverable requirements of each
research task, and resolution of any
questions in initial task meetings with
the project staff and team partners;
- task assignments, allocation of personnel
resources, preparation of task-specific
work instructions as necessary to manage
technical activities, preparation and/or
modification of procurement documents for
consultants or subcontractors, and the
technical performance of the work;
- monitoring of the technical, fiscal, and
quality performance of Golder and
subcontractor personnel; preparation of
routine weekly, biweekly, and monthly
progress reports addressing
(respectively) man-hour expenditures,
technical progress, and technical
performance summaries; and the initiation
of in-process corrective actions wherever
required;
- independent technical review of all
deliverables;
- evaluation of the fiscal, technical, and
quality performance of the completed work
order for quality improvement purposes,
and the initiation of appropriate
corrective or management actions.
Key Management Personnel
Project management and quality assurance
activities are described under Task 6 above. By
defining a separate technical task for project
management, the Golder
team will ensure efficient use of project
resources in directed, focused research for
development of new technologies for fractured
reservoir site characterization and development.
The key personnel assigned to the project are
shown in Figure
2-7. The personnel proposed for this task are
experienced are committed to carry out the work
required. As a result, project and task managers
will perform much of the technical work
themselves, providing BDM with a technically
superior research. The commitment of Golder
Associates to this project can be seen in the
commitment of time made by senior personnel.
Responsibilities of individuals assigned to the
project, and estimated man-month (mm) commitments
of key personnel are as follows:
Dr.
William S. Dershowitz (Project Manager, 6
man months): Responsible for coordination of task
work, control of budgets and schedules,
coordination of work between Golder, BDM/NIPER,
Marathon, and MIT, and supervision of Task
leaders. Dr. Dershowitz will provide the primary
contact between BDM/NIPER and Golder. Dr.
Dershowitz will also play an important role in
the technical execution of the project. Dr.
Dershowitz will also serve as the task manager
and technical lead for Task 2 Technology
Development, and for Technology Transfer (Task
5).
Dr.
Paul LaPointe (Task 3 and 4 Manager, 7.5
man-months): Responsible for implementation of
the integrated discrete fracture reservoir model,
and the demonstration application at the Yates
field.
Dr. Tom
Doe (Task 1 Manager, 2 man-months)
Responsible for direction and integration of MIT
research with Marathon site data and Golder
Associates fractured reservoir simulation and
data analysis technologies.
Prof.
Herbert Einstein (MIT Contact, Task 1.2
and 1.3, 2.5 man-months): Responsible for
directing research on single fracture and
fracture network scale development of discrete
fracture approaches. Prof. Einstein will provide
the primary point of contract between Golder and
MIT.
Dr. Neil Hurley (Tasks 1.1, 2.3, and
4.2, 3 man-months (est, in-kind)) will be
responsible for all activities undertaken by
Marathon Oil within the project. Dr. Hurley will
provide the technical lead for collection of site
fracture and reservoir data, and for development
of TAGS fractured reservoir production
technologies.
|