| Description
of the Yates Field Intoduction
The Yates Field is located in Pecos and
Crocket Counties of West Texas, approximately 80
miles south of Midland. It was discovered in 1926
and had produced nearly 1.3 billion barrels of
oil until the beginning of 1993. The recovery at
that time was approximately 30% of the estimated
OOIP. At the end of 1992 a total of 1100
production and 57 injection wells were active.
Geology
The Yates Field produces from four formations
(Seven Rivers, Queen, Grayburg and San Andres).
The Seven Rivers interval is composed of
interbedded sandstone, siltstone and some
dolomite. The Queen consists of siltstones and
fine sandstones interbedded with silty dolomites.
The Grayburg is composed of interbedded dolomite
and siltstone. Unlike the overlying Seven Rivers
and Queen, the Grayburg produces from fractured
dolomite.
The San Andres is the thickest and most
prolific formation within the Yates
Field. The unique reservoir quality of the
San Andres is a function of depositional
carbonate shoal facies, extensive natural
fracturing, karst, dolomitization, and
precipitation of secondary calcite cement.
Early Production History
Before 1976, the Yates Field was operated
under depletion, producing mainly from the
fractured Grayburg and San Andres formations. As
pressure depleted free gas evolved and migrated
rapidly through the natural fracture system to
the structural top to form a slow expanding gas
cap.
Following the Yates Field unitization in 1976,
a gas injection pressure maintenance program was
instituted to retard the invasion of water into
the oil producing portion of the reservoir and to
conserve energy. This allowed greater utilization
of the efficient gas cap gravity drainage
mechanism.
Additional pressure maintenance and infill
development well programs were implemented during
the 1980's to improve recovery. Starting with a
pilot waterflood on the western flanks of the
field in 1979, a pattern polymer flood was
expanded into additional portions of the westside
oil column from 1983 to 1986. The polymer flood
operations were suspended on schedule in 1989
while pattern waterflooding continued. During
late 1985, carbon dioxide injection commenced in
the northern, eastern and crestal areas of the
field. Carbon dioxide injection was abandoned in
1991.
The Co-Production Project
All programs mentioned above only addressed
the westside oil column and the eastside gas cap.
Recognizing the need to recover the large
remaining fieldwide reservoir target contained in
the portions of the reservoir bypassed
by water encroachment,
a fieldwide Co-Production Project
was initiated in late 1992. The main goal of
the project was to de-water reservoir areas
containing oil bypassed by water encroachment by
lowering the gas-oil and water-oil contacts using
high-volume water withdrawals and gas cap
inflation (increase reservoir pressure using
methane and nitrogen injection).
A second effect is the initiation of gas-oil
gravity drainage within the expanded gas cap.
The water invasion occured in the field's
fracture network bypassing the oil located in the
highly oil saturated matrix. The oil can only be
recovered if the water is removed from the
fracture network allowing the oil to flow from
the matrix into the fracture system.
During the Co-Production Project the aquifer
encroachment was reversed and a significant
amount of oil was recovered that could not have
been produced by conventional primary or
secondary production methods (see Tract 17
oil production).
Fracture Network
In addition to the Co-Production Project,
since 1992 the natural fracture network within
the Yates Field has been studied in detail. It
was shown that all the wells in the field receive
matrix fluids from conduits in the extensive
natural fracture network. By focusing on the
areas where the fracture network is most
developed, it was possible to take advantage of
the natural drainage system by maximizing
withdrawals from high rate, high efficiency wells
in these areas. Between 1992 and 1994 almost 400
wells where shut in while keeping a stable total
daily oil production rate.
For the existing wells it was possible to
identify those located in highly fractured areas
of the reservoir based on their production
history. In 1993 and 1994 more than 30 new
short-radius horizontal wells were drilled for
which such data was not available.
A discrete fracture network modeling
approach using FracMan was used to study the
spatial distribution of fractures in the field
and to optimize location and orientation of the
new horizontal wells.
Thermal Recovery Process
The application of the Co-Production
Reservoir Management plan has significantly
improved oil production from the Yates Field. An
additional opportunity exists to explore the oil
potential remaining beyond the scope of the
Co-Production Process. The reservoir has a large
gas cap containing slowly draining oil in the
matrix system, above a thin fracture oil column.
Improved recovery processes to take advantage of
this situation are limited by the fractured
nature of the reservoir which makes displacement
processes ineffective.
Oil flow from the the matrix into the the
fracture system is controlled by gravity
drainage. The physical properties controlling
this process are matrix permeability, density
contrast, relative permeability and viscosity.
The relative permeability and the viscosity are
parameters that can be changed using EOR methods.
Heat flow through the fracture system (and thus
heat transfer from the fractures into the matrix
system) will assist oil drainage by reducing
oil viscosity and improving the oil relative
permeability. Because of the fractured nature of
the reservoir this process can not be designed as
a classic thermal flood. Instead Marathon
invented a process called Thermally Assisted
Gravity Segregation (TAGS).
Click here for more
about TAGS.
|